View Full Version : The Constitution Of India


hindustan
20th August 2006, 08:31 PM
To secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;

and to promote among them all

FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;



The Constitution of India was passed by the Constituent Assembly of India on November 26, 1949, and came into effect on January 26, 1950. India celebrates January 26 each year as Republic Day. It is the longest written constitution of any independent nation in the world, containing 444 articles and 10 schedules (later 12), as well as numerous amendments, for a total of 117,369 words in the English language version.

The importance of the Constitution

The Constitution lays down the basic structure of government under which the people are to be governed. It establishes the main organs of government - the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. The Constitution not only defines the powers of each organ, but also demarcates their responsibilities. It regulates the relationship between the different organs and between the government and the people.

The Constitution is superior to all other laws of the country. Every law enacted by the government has to be in conformity with the Constitution. The Constitution lays down the national goals of India - Democracy, Socialism, Secularism and National Integration. It also spells out the rights and duties of citizens.

The Constitution applies to the State of Jammu and Kashmir with certain exceptions and modifications as provided in article 370 and the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954

History

The Cabinet Mission

World War II in Europe came to an end on May 9, 1945. In July, a new government came to power in the United Kingdom. The new British government announced its Indian Policy and decided to convene a constitution drafting body. Three British cabinet ministers were sent to find a solution to the question of India's independence. This team of ministers was called the Cabinet Mission.

The Cabinet Mission discussed the framework of the constitution and laid down in some detail the procedure to be followed by the constitution drafting body. Elections for the 296 seats assigned to the British Indian provinces were completed by July-August 1946. With the independence of India on August 15, 1947, the Constituent Assembly became a fully sovereign body. The Assembly began work on 9 December 1947.

The Constituent Assembly

The people of India elected the members of the provincial assemblies, who in turn elected the members of the Constituent Assembly.

The Constituent Assembly had members belonging to different communities and regions of India. It also had members representing different political persuasions. Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajendra Prasad, Sardar Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee were some important figures in the Assembly's discussions. There were more than 30 members of the scheduled classes. The Anglo-Indian community was represented by Frank Anthony and the Parsis were represented by H.P. Modi. The Chairman of the Minorities Committee was Harendra Coomar Mookerjee, a distinguished Christian who represented all Christians other than Anglo-Indians. Constitutional experts like Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyer, B.R. Ambedkar, B.N. Rau and K.M. Munshi were also members of the Assembly. Sarojini Naidu and Vijaylakshmi Pandit were important women members. Dr. Sachidanand Sinha was the first president of the Constituent Assembly. Later, Dr.Rajendra Prasad was elected president of the Constituent Assembly while B.R. Ambedkar was appointed the Chairman of the Drafting Committee.

The Constituent Assembly met for 166 days, spread over a period of 2 years, 11 months and 18 days. Its sessions were open to the press and the public.

Objectives Resolution

The underlying principles of the Constitution were laid down by Jawaharlal Nehru in his Objectives Resolution :
Jawaharlal Nehru signing the Constitution of India

* India is an Independent, Sovereign, Republic;
* India shall be a Union of erstwhile British Indian territories, Indian States, and other parts outside British India and Indian States as are willing to be a part of the Union;
* Territories forming the Union shall be autonomous units and exercise all powers and functions of the Government and administration, except those assigned to or vested in the Union;
* All powers and authority of sovereign and independent India and its constitution shall flow from the people;
* All people of India shall be guaranteed and secured social, economic and political justice; equality of status and opportunities before law; and fundamental freedoms - of talk, expression, belief, faith, worship, vocation, association and action - subject to law and public morality;
* The minorities, backward and tribal areas, depressed and other backward classes, shall be provided adequate safeguards;
* The territorial integrity of the Republic and its sovereign rights on land, sea and air shall be maintained according to justice and law of civilized nations;
* The land would make full and willing contribution to the promotion of world peace and welfare of mankind.


Features

The Constitution of India draws extensively from Western legal traditions in its enunciation of the principles of liberal democracy. It is distinguished from many Western constitutions, however, in its elaboration of principles reflecting aspirations to end the inequities of traditional social relations and enhance the social welfare of the population. According to constitutional scholar Granville Austin, probably no other nation's constitution "has provided so much impetus toward changing and rebuilding society for the common good." Since its enactment, the constitution has fostered a steady concentration of power in the hands of the central government - especially the Office of the Prime Minister. This centralization has occurred in the face of the increasing assertiveness of an array of ethnic and caste groups across Indian society. Increasingly, the government has responded to the resulting tensions by resorting to the formidable array of authoritarian powers provided by the Constitution. However, a new assertiveness shown by the Supreme Court and the Election Commission suggests that the remaining checks and balances among the country's political institutions are resilient and capable of supporting Indian democracy. Furthermore regional parties are gaining popularity at the expense of national parties which has led to coalition governments at the centre. As a consequence, power is becoming more decentralised.

The Constitution in its final form owes much to a number of different principles from various other Constitutions. The general structure of the Constitution's democratic framework was largely the work of B. N. Rau, a constitutional scholar of international standing. Supporters of independent India's founding father, Mohandas K. Gandhi, backed measures that would form a decentralized polity with strong local government — known as panchayat — in a system known as Panchayati Raj, i.e. rule by Panchayats. However, the view of more modernist leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru, ultimately prevailed leading to the establishment of a parliamentary system of government and a federal system with a strong central government.


Features of the Indian Constitution adapted from other Constitutions

British Constitution

* Parliamentary form of government
* The idea of single citizenship
* The idea of the Rule of law
* Institution of Speaker and his role
* Lawmaking procedure
* Procedure established by Law u/a 13

United States Constitution

* Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is similar to the United States Bill of Rights
* Federal structure of government
* Power of Judicial Review and independence of the judiciary
* President as supreme commander of armed forced u/a 52
* Due process of law u/a 13

Irish Constitution

* Constitutional enunciation of the directive principles of state policy

French Constitution

* Ideals of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity

Canadian Constitution

* A quasi-federal form of government (a federal system with a strong central government)
* The idea of Residual Powers

Australian Constitution

* The idea of the Concurrent list
* Freedom of trade and commerce within the country and between the states

Soviet Constitution

* Fundamental Rights and Directive principles of India

Japan Constitution

* Fundamental Duties u/a 51-A

German Weimer Constitution

* Emergency Provision u/a 368


Schedules

Schedules can be added to the constitution by amendment. The twelve schedules in force cover the designations of the States and Union Territories; emoluments for high-level officials; forms of oaths; allocation of the number of seats in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States - the upper house of Parliament) per State or Union Territory; provisions for the administration and control of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes (areas and tribes needing special protection due to disadvantageous conditions); provisions for the administration of tribal areas in Assam; the Union (central government), State, and Concurrent (dual) lists of responsibilities; the official languages; land and tenure reforms; the association of Sikkim with India; anti-defection provisions for Members of Parliament and Members of the State Legislatures; rural development; and urban planning.


Amendments

Methods of Amendment

* By simple majority of the Parliament: Amendments in this category can be made by a simple majority of members present and voting, before sending them for the President's assent.
* By special majority of the Parliament: Amendments can be made in this category by a two - third majority of the total number of members present and voting, which should not be less than half of the total membership of the house.
* By special majority of the Parliament and ratification of at least half of the state legislatures by special majority. After this, it is sent to the President for his assent. [1]

An amendment to the Constitution is an extremely difficult affair, and normally needs at least two-thirds of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha to pass it. The Constitution of India is one of the most frequently amended constitutions in the world. The first amendment came only a year after the adoption of the Constitution and instituted numerous minor changes. Many more amendments followed, at a rate of almost two amendments per year since 1950. Many matters that would be dealt with by ordinary statutes in most democracies must be dealt with by constitutional amendment in India due to the document's extraordinary detail. Most of the Constitution can be amended after a quorum of more than half of the members of each house in Parliament passes an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote. Articles pertaining to the distribution of legislative authority between Union and State governments must also be approved by fifty percent of State legislatures.

In 1974, the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala enunciated the Basic Structure Doctrine, which expanded the scope of judicial review to include the power to review Constitutional Amendments passed by the Legislature. Using this doctrine, the Supreme Court has struck down the 39th Amendment and parts of the 42nd Amendment as being violative of the Basic Structure of the Constitution. Some noted authors of Constitutional law, such as HM Seervai have argued that this is an usurpation of amending power by the judiciary which was never intended by the framers of the Constitution


Articles

* Part I - consists of Articles 1 - 4 on the Union and its Territory
* Part II - consists of Articles 5 - 11 on Citizenship.
* Part III - consists of Articles 12 - 35 on Fundamental Rights.

* Articles 14 - 18 on Right to Equality,
* Articles 19 - 22 on Right to Freedom,
* Articles 23 - 24 on Right against Exploitation,
* Articles 25 - 28 on Right to Freedom of Religion,
* Articles 29 - 31 on Cultural and Educational Rights,
* Articles 32 - 35 on Right to Constitutional Remedies.

* Part IV - consists of Articles 36 - 51 on Directive Principles of State Policy.
* Part IV (A) consists of Article 51A - Fundamental Duties of each citizen of India.
* Part V - consists of Articles on the Union.

Chapter I - Articles 52 to 78 on The Executive.

* Articles 52 - 73 on the President and Vice-President,
* Articles 74 - 75 on Council of Ministers,
* Articles 76 - Attorney General of India,
* Articles 77 - 78 on the Conduct of Government Business

Chapter II - Articles 79 - 122 on Parliament.

* Articles 79 - 88 on Constitution of Parliament,
* Articles 89 - 98 on Officers of Parliament,
* Articles 99 - 100 on Conduct of Business,
* Articles 101 - 104 on Disqualification of members,
* Articles 105 - 106 on Powers, privileges and Immunities of Parliament and its Members,
* Articles 107 - 111 on Legislative Procedure,
* Articles 112 - 117 on Procedure in Financial Matters,
* Articles 118 - 122 on Procedure Generally.

Chapter III - Article 123 on the Legislative Powers of the President.

* Article 123 on Power of president to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament

Chapter IV - Articles 124 - 147 on The Union Judiciary.

* Articles 124 - 147 Establishment and Constitution of the Supreme Court

Chapter V - Articles 148 - 151 on the Controller and Auditor-General of India.

* Articles 148 - 151 on Duties and powers of Comptroller and Auditor-General.

* Part VI - Articles on the States.

Chapter I - Article 152 on the General definition of a State of the Union of India

* Article 152 - Exclusion of the state of Jammu and Kashmir from the general definition of a state of the Union of India.

Chapter II - Articles 153 - 167 on The Executive

* Articles 153 - 162 on The Governor,
* Articles 163 - 164 on The Council of Ministers,
* Article 165 on the Advocate-General for the State.
* Articles 166 - 167 on the Conduct of Government Business.

Chapter III - Articles 168 - 212 on The State Legislature.

* Articles 168 - 177 General
* Articles 178 - 187 on the Officers of the State Legislature,
* Articles 188 - 189 on Conduct of Business,
* Articles 190 - 193 on Disqualification of members,
* Articles 194 - 195 on Powers, Privileges and Immunities Parliament and its Members,
* Articles 196 - 201 on Legislative Procedure,
* Articles 202 - 207 on Procedure in Financial Matters,
* Articles 208 - 212 on Procedure Generally.

Chapter IV - Article 213 on the Legislative Powers of the Governor

* Article 213 - Power of president to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament

Chapter V - Articles 214 - 231 on The High Courts in the States.

* Articles 214 - 231 on High Courts in the States,

Chapter VI - Articles 233 - 237 on the Subordinate Courts

* Articles 232 - 237 on Subordinate Courts

* Part VII - consists of Articles on States in the B part of the First schedule.

* Article 238 Repealed, Replaced by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch.

* Part VIII - consists of Articles on The Union Territories

* Articles 239 - 242 Administration, creation of Council of Ministers and High Courts

* Part IX - consists of Articles on the Panchayat system.

* Articles 243 - 243O on the Gram Sabha and Panchayat system

* Part IXA - consists of Articles on Municipalties.

* Articles 243P - 243ZG on Municipalties

* Part X - consists of Articles on the scheduled and Tribal Areas

* Articles 244 - 244A on Administration, creation of Council of Ministers, and legislatures.

* Part XI - consists of Articles on Relations between the Union and the States.

Chapter I - Articles 245 - 255 on the Distribution of Legislative Powers

* Articles 245 - 255 on Distribution of Legislative Relations

Chapter II - Articles 256 - 263 on Administrative Relations

* Articles 256 - 261 - General
* Article 262 - on Disputes relating to waters.
* Article 263 - on Co-ordination between States

* Part XII - consists of Articles on Finance, Property, Contracts and Suits

Chapter I - Articles 264 - 291 on Finance

* Articles 264 - 267 General
* Articles 268 - 281 on Distribution Revenues between the Union and the States
* Articles 282 - 291 on Miscellaneous Financial Provisions

Chapter II - Articles 292 - 293 on Borrowing

* Articles 292 - 293 on Borrowing by States

Chapter III - Articles 294 - 300 on Property, Contracts, Right, Liabilities, Obligations and Suits

* Articles 294 - 300 on Succession to property assets, liabilities, and obligations.

Chapter IV - Article 300A on the Right to Property

* Article 300A - on Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law

* Part XIII - consists of Articles on Trade and Commerce within the territory of India

* Articles 301 - 305 on Freedom of Trade and Commerce, and the power of Parliament and States to impose restrictions on the same
* Article 306 - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch.
* Article 307 - Appointment of authority for carrying out the purposes of articles 301 to 304.

* Part XIV - consists of Articles on Services Under the Union and the States

Chapter I - Articles 308 - 314 on Services

* Articles 308 - 313 on Services
* Article 314 - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Twenty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1972, s. 3 (w.e.f. 29-8-1972).

Chapter II - Articles 315 - 323 on the Public Service Commissions

* Articles 315 - 323 on Public Service Commissions

* Part XIVA - consists of Articles on Tribunals

* Articles 323 A - 323 B

* Part XV - consists of Articles on Elections

* Articles 324 - 329 on Elections
* Article 329A - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 36 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

* Part XVI - consists of Articles on Special Provisions Relating to certain Classes.

* Articles 330 - 342 on Reservations

* Part XVII - consists of Articles on Official Language

Chapter I - Articles 343 - 344 on Language of the Union

* Articles 343 - 344 Official Language of the Union

* Chapter II - Articles 345 - 347 on Regional Languages

* Articles 345 - 347 on Language of the State

Chapter III - Articles 348 - 349 on Language of the Supreme Court, High courts, Etc

* Articles 348 - 349 on Language used in Supreme Court, High courts Etc

Chapter IV - Articles 350 - 351 on Special Directives

* Article 350 - on Language to be used in representations for redress of grievances.
* Article 350A - on Facilities for instruction in mother-tongue at primary stage.
* Article 350B - on provision for Special Officer for linguistic minorities.
* Article 351 - on Directive for development of the Hindi language.

* Part XVIII - consists of Articles on Emergency Provisions

* Articles 352 - 359 on Emergency Provisions
* Article 359A - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989, s. 3

(w.e.f. 6-1-1990).

Article 360 - on Provisions as to financial emergency.

* Part XIX - Miscellaneous

* Articles 361 - 361A - Miscellaneous
* Article 362 - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 2.
* Articles 363 - 367 - Miscellaneous

* Part XX - consists of Articles on Amendment of the Constitution

* Articles 368 on the Power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor

* Part XXI - consists of Articles on Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions

* Articles 369 - 378A on Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions
* Article 379 - 391 - Repealed - Replaced by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956,

s. 29 and Sch.

* Article 392 - on the Power of the President to remove difficulties.

* Part XXII consists of Articles on short title, date of commencement, Authoritative text in Hindi and Repeals.

* Articles 393 - 395 Commencement, authoritative text in Hindi and repeals

Preamble

WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;

and to promote among them all

FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

The preamble is not a part of the Constitution of India as it is not enforceable in a court of law. However, the Supreme Court has, in the case of 'Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala', recognized that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and may be used to interpret ambiguous areas of the Constitution where differing interpretations present themselves. However, the Preamble is useful as an interpretive tool only if there is an ambiguity in the article itself and should not be treated as a rights bestowing part of the Constitution.

An interesting side note concerns the words "SOCIALIST" and "SECULAR" in the preamble. The original drafting used the words "SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC". The two additional words "SOCIALIST" and "SECULAR" were introduced by the controversial 42nd amendment. The amendment was pushed through by Indira Gandhi in 1976, when she had dictatorial powers. A committee under the chairmanship of Sardar Swaran Singh recommended that this amendment be enacted after being constituted to study the question of amending the constitution in the light of past experience.


The importance of the Preamble

The wording of the Preamble highlights some of the fundamental values and guiding principles on which the Constitution of India is based. The Preamble serves as a guiding light for the Constitution and judges interpret the Constitution in its light. In a majority of decisions, the Supreme Court of India has held that the objectives specified in the preamble constitute the basic structure of the Indian Constitution, which cannot be amended. Though the Preamble is a part of the constitution still it nor any of its content is legally enforcible.

The first words of the Preamble - "We, the people" - signifies that power is ultimately vested in the hands of the people of India. The Preamble lays down the most important national goals which every citizen and the government must try to achieve, such as socialism, secularism and national integration. Lastly, it lays down the date for the adoption of the Constitution - 26 November 1949.


Explanation of some of the important words in the Preamble


Sovereign

The word sovereign means supreme or independent. India is internally and externally sovereign - externally free from the control of any foreign power and internally, it has a free government which is directly elected by the people and makes laws that govern the people.


Socialist

The word socialist was added to the Preamble by the 42nd amendment act of 1976. It implies social and economic equality. Social equality in this context means the absence of discrimination on the grounds of caste, colour, creed, sex, religion, language, etc. Under social equality, everyone has equal status and opportunities. Economic equality in this context means that the government will endeavour to make the distribution of wealth more equal and provide a decent standard of living for all. This is in effect emphasizing a commitment towards the formation of a Welfare state.

India has adopted a mixed economy and the government has framed many laws to achieve the aim of social equality, such as the Abolition of Untouchability and Zamindari, the Equal Wages Act and the Child Labour Prohibition Act.


Secular

The word secular was inserted into the Preamble by the 42nd amendment act of 1976. It implies equality of all religions and religious tolerance. India, therefore does not have an official state religion. Every person has the right to preach, practise and propagate any religion they choose. The government must not favour or discriminate against any religion. It must treat all religions with equal respect. All citizens, irrespective of their religious beliefs are equal in the eyes of law. No religious instruction is imparted in government or government-aided schools. The Supreme Court in S.R Bommai v. Union of India held that secularism was an integral part of the basic structure of the constitution.


Democratic

India is a democracy. The people of India elect their governments at all levels (Union, State and local) by a system of universal adult franchise. Every citizen of India, who is 18 years of age and above and not otherwise debarred by law, is entitled to vote. Every citizen enjoys this right without any discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, colour, sex, religion or education.


Republic

As opposed to a monarchy, in which the head of state is appointed on hereditary basis for a lifetime or until he abdicates from the throne, a democratic republic is an entity in which the head of state is elected, directly or indirectly, for a fixed tenure. The President of India is elected by an electoral college for a term of five years.


Criticisms

The Constitution of India differs from other western constitutions, from which it has derived inspiration, in the fact that it stipulates the supremacy of the legislature as the supreme law making body of the land. In that respect, it renders the legislative arm of government nominally more powerful than either the executive or the judiciary. It is also widely criticised that although the underlying constitution is very sound, it has provided scope for misuse by people in power which is evident from the prevailing corruption and poverty in the country.

purushottam
30th January 2008, 07:43 PM
:rolleyes:

We have as a formality celebrated the Republic day as on this day the Constitution of India came in force. Constitution has different dictionary meanings.One is about health of a person and secondly it means that a system of laws which formally states people's rights and duties. This does not mean that state has no duties towards public. Judiciary is the holder of the Constitution and it is the duty of the judiciary to watch that the law of the nation is framed and administrated within its frame work.

The main grievance about judiciary is that it takes long time to get the cases decided .We shall discuss on this point on some other occasion. Presently I would like to submit that the policies of the government also causes delay in deciding the pending cases. Most of the policies of govts. are like white elephants. Huge amount is being spent on such schemes which do not give any return to the public byway of quick and speedy justice. One of the scheme is that of Rural Mobile Courts. Government of India is providing about 600 Nayaya Rath for the rural judicial services. Each Rath [bus] will cost about 20 lakhs of rupees. The result will be cipher. It is not possible for a judge to move from place to place in such bus and decide cases effectively. The nature of work of a judge is quite different and is not a clerical or administrative work. The judge has to decide the rights and liabilities of parties in effective manner as his judgements have binding effect. For that every time study of law books,rullings and file is required. Do not equate the work with that of a peddler or hawker who would hawk and shout like get justice done[Phaisala Kara Lo.]Let politicians do not make mockery of justice as it is back bone of democracy.



In fact the aim of the govt. is not that people should get justice but the scheme is that how govt. money is spent in such a manner that benefit may be given to some automobile businessmen and employment to few people and to mount recurring expenditure. It is also not easy to get people with sound legal knowledge who can work as judges in Gram Nyayalaya .Recently 425 Civil judges Class II have been selected and about 150 of them being appointed in M.P. but for them there is no accommodation and no infrastructure is created. This is all mockery prevailing in judiciary and the government.



The gram Nyayalaya scheme will prove to be sporadic and for want of qualified judges justice will get lop-sided.



What is required is decentralisation of powers on district level judiciary. Under Article 32[3] of the Constitution it is said the "without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause [1] and clause[2],Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of the jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause [2]" . Under clause [2] the Supreme Court has power to issue directions or orders or writs[all the 5 writs]for the enforcement of any of the writs under Part III that is Fundamental Rights. If it is done the people will not have to approach High Court of the state but they will find convenient to approach the District Court of their District. This will help the people to get redress to their rights through writ petitions where bar is created for civil courts to here certain types of cases.



The governments should make plans and schemes in such way that in less expenditure justice is dispensed to the public. Presently justice is being tried to be dispensed with the public!:rolleyes:

purushottam
30th January 2008, 08:28 PM
:rolleyes:The greatest and voluminous Constitution of India is now not working well. It is more than 60 years old and requires to have over all change. Constitution means health of a person and Constitution with reference to nation is the set of laws through wich the nation is being ruled.

Art.1 of the Constitution says 'India that is bharat.........' The question is why Bharat that is the India known in English......should be written is not yet answered by politicians. We require answer. It was said that the name as India has gained ground and it would be difficult to change the name. No please that is not the case. The name of Burma was changed to myanmar and world could recognise it as such. The capital of China was changed from Packing to :rolleyes:Beijing and the world could know it. Why it will not happen in the case of Bharat that is India? P V Kamat the then member of the Constituate assembly had moved a proposal but was not accepted. This shows our mentality that we preserve ideas of slavery and are biased with minorities.

purushottam
2nd March 2008, 12:41 PM
:rolleyes:
In a writ petition a Bench of Supreme Court has directed to refer the petition regarding the tainted ministers to a larger Bench. Arguments in length would be held in due course.
Apart from the legal aspect of the matter there is certainly a moral, ethical and cultural aspect of the same. We Indians should never ignore this fact. It is wisely said that of what avail are the empty laws if we lack principle? One may see that international law is revolutionized by putting morals into it. I would also like to quote an ancient Indian saying that we do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children.We are the guiding part for our children.
In fact when we use the word tainted we use in general sense meaning there by a thing or person of bad quality. It is a sobour use of the word by the media for the politicians as birds of same feather fly together. One may not say that every crime is always immoral as for some crimes mens rea may not be essential ingredient like committing breach of traffic and municipal rules for maintaining the city in order and clean. One has to make a distincion between heinous, flagitious, flagrant or atrocious acts. Yes, it isn’t any sin if you crack a few laws now and then, just so long as you don’t break any. Thus cracking laws requires no mens rea but otherwise it is an essential ingredient.
With this back ground let us see the position of our tainted ministers who were knowingly included in the ministry. These all ministers are responsible for heinous offences of murders, Criminal breach of trust or Criminal miss appropriation etc. It requires intention or knowledge [mens rea ] and therefore these offences are termed as heinous offences. It is true that politicians have to participate in political activities and public agitations and for some reason or the other they are being prosecuted but these offences may not be described as heinous offences. Alexander Pop had in 1738 said that all, all look up with reverential awe, at crime that ‘scape, or triumph o’er the law.
We are heading towards anarchy. The society has gone beyond the bounds and bonds and the reason can be well described in the words of Justice Louis D.Brande. In the case of Olmstead v. United States he said that crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites everyman to become a law unto him; it invites anarchy.
There are two-yard sticks created for different punishment. by politicians. For poor and un influential and the other is persons having influence and having nuisance value.
Jessica Milford, a writer writes and asks when a conduct is crime, and when is a crime not a crime? The writer says when some body Up There—a monarch, a dictator, a Pope a Legislator—so decrees. Looking to few ministers and elective members I remember one quotation of Samuel Butler who in the years of 1663-78 had said that no Indian prince has to his palace more followers than a thief to the gallows.

Now let us look to the other aspect of the misuse of power by the government in respect of appointment of ministers who are not members of either House or any legislation. It is the politicians and the governments who have mostly misused and made mockery of the Constitution of India. Art. 75[5] and Art.164 [4] says that A minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of either House of Parliament [Legislature of state] shall at the expiration of that period ceases to be a Minister. In M.P. in the regime of Dig Vijay Singh One Khan from Jabalpur was appointed as minister when the period of the Legislative Assembly was to expire within 3 months of his appointment. Was not the misuse of the power and making ridicule the constitution? It was all done with the intention of appeasement of Minority community.

The President or the Governor is not help less in this respect. It is said that the prerogative to appoint ministers is of the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister as the case may be and the President or the Governor has to act on the advise of the PM or CM. No doubt Art.74 [1] of the Constitution was amended and in addition a proviso was inserted in the year 1976 and 1979 respectively and it was made obligatory for the President to act on the advice renderd after sending the proposal back by him. This concept it self is wrong. The Constitution does not say that the President or the Governor should ignore morals , ethics and the character of the nation and may appoint criminals as ministers to rule the nation or a state. The provisions should always be read in between the lines and keeping in mind the Preamble of the Constitution which speaks about the ‘justice, social, economic and political. If we appoint criminals, are we doing justice to the people should be the point to be considered by the President or the Governors. How can a criminals who would otherwise be disqualified to be a member of elective body be appointed as minister? The appointments of ministers should not be a mechanical process for the President or the Governors but it should be made after due consideration in right perspective. Such interpretation of Constitution cannot be accepted to kill the spirit of the same. Assume that the President or the Governor refuses to act on the advise of the PM or the CM can they justify why they are appointing criminals on such posts?
To sum up the subject in brief I would like to submit the quotation of John F.Dilton from the book of The Laws and Jurisprudence…1894; where in he said that ethical considerations can no more be excluded from the administration of justice, which is the end and purpose of all civil laws, than one can exclude the vital air from his room and live. How ever in India it may happen that with a different fate, men may commit the same crimes; one may gets jail, one gets a cross as a reward of villainy, another a crown. We wish that in India let the truth prevail!

purushottam
7th May 2008, 12:20 PM
:rolleyes: And again India that is Bharat

We feel proud when we think about policy of appeasement .The capital of China was packing and it was overnight changed and named, as Beijing and the world could know it. The name of Burma was changed to Myanmar and world could know it Pars hiya was changed to Iran and the world could know it. But our argument is India is known to world and will be difficult for the different countries to know it as Bharat. Secondly if we use Bharat then our so-called secular and non-secular status will adversely affect the integrity of the nation! Thirdly M V Kamat who is a columnist in news paper had suggested to Constitute assembly to insert in Art1 of the Constitution that instead of India that is Bharat write that Bharat previously known as India. But that suggestion was turned down. And so far as Hindustan is concerned it is alleged that it is Hindus who live in the nation and the Muslim countries and Muslims call it as Hindustan.

:rolleyes: